Each “Analyze a quarrel” essay may be scored on a 6-point holistic scale according to your criteria below.
A single combined score is reported because it is more reliable than either task score alone although the GRE ® Analytical Writing measure contains two discrete analytical writing tasks. The score reported will represent the common of this scores when it comes to two tasks.
Score of 6 Outstanding
A 6 paper presents a cogent, well-articulated critique associated with the argument and conveys meaning skillfully.
A paper that is typical this category:
- clearly identifies important top features of the argument and analyzes them insightfully
- develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically and connects them with clear transitions
- effectively supports the primary points for the critique
- demonstrates control of language, including word that is appropriate and sentence variety
- demonstrates facility aided by the conventions (for example., grammar, usage and mechanics) of standard written English but may have errors that are minor
Score of 5 Strong
A 5 paper presents a generally thoughtful, well-developed critique associated with argument and conveys meaning clearly.
A paper that is typical this category:
- clearly identifies important top features of the argument and analyzes them in a way that is generally perceptive
- develops ideas clearly, organizes them logically and connects them with appropriate transitions
- sensibly supports the primary points for the critique
- demonstrates control of language, including appropriate word choice and sentence variety
- demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English, but may have minor errors
Score of 4 Adequate
A 4 paper presents a competent critique of the argument and conveys meaning adequately.
A typical paper in this category:
- identifies and analyzes important top features of the argument
- develops and organizes ideas satisfactorily, but might not connect them with transitions
- supports the key points associated with critique
- Demonstrates control that is sufficient of to express ideas with reasonable clarity
- generally demonstrates control over the conventions of standard written English, but may have some errors
Score of 3 Limited
A 3 paper demonstrates some competence with its critique of this argument as well as in conveying meaning, but is obviously flawed.
A paper that is typical this category exhibits a number of of this following characteristics:
- write my paper for me
- will not identify or analyze a lot of the important features of the argument, while some analysis for the argument is present
- mainly analyzes tangential or irrelevant matters, or reasons poorly
- is limited in the logical development and organization of ideas
- offers support of little relevance and value for points for the critique
- lacks clarity in expressing ideas
- contains occasional major errors or frequent minor errors in grammar, usage or mechanics that may interfere with meaning
Score of 2 Seriously Flawed
A 2 paper demonstrates serious weaknesses in analytical writing.
A typical paper in this category exhibits a number of for the following characteristics:
- will not present a critique predicated on logical analysis, but may instead present the writer’s own views on the subject
- Does not develop ideas or is illogical and disorganized
- provides little if any relevant or reasonable support
- Has problems that are serious the usage of language plus in sentence structure that frequently interfere with meaning
- contains serious errors in grammar, usage or mechanics that frequently meaning that is obscure
Score of 1 Fundamentally Deficient
A 1 paper demonstrates fundamental deficiencies in analytical writing.
A typical paper in this category exhibits a number of of the following characteristics:
- provides little or no proof of the ability to understand and analyze the argument
- provides little if any proof of the capacity to develop an organized response
- Has problems that are severe language and sentence structure that persistently interfere with meaning
- contains pervasive errors in grammar, usage or mechanics that end up in incoherence